Tampilkan postingan dengan label James M. Cain. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label James M. Cain. Tampilkan semua postingan
Sabtu, 24 September 2011
How Charles Ardai Picked Up a Cocktail Waitress
This past week noir-heads were were thrilled to learn that Hard Case Crime's Charles Ardai had found a lost James M. Cain novel called The Cocktail Waitress, and will be publishing it next fall. I first read about this supposedly "lost" novel in Roy Hoopes's excellent biography Cain, never imagining we'd all have the chance to enjoy it. Ardai, who's clearly the Indiana Jones of pulp fiction, agree to talk about how he tracked the novel down.
Secret Dead Blog: How did you manage to unearth The Cocktail Waitress manuscript? Can you tell me more about the "detective work" involved?
Charles Ardai: A little more than nine years ago, when I first approached Max Allan Collins with the idea of writing for Hard Case Crime (this was a year before we signed the original deal with Dorchester, two years before the first Hard Case Crime book ever got published), we were brainstorming about what authors and books might be a good fit for our new line, and he mentioned that he knew of one last crime novel James M. Cain wrote at the end of his life but never published. He hadn’t actually seen or read the book, all he knew was the title: The Cocktail Waitress. But he knew that it existed. And he suggested that it might make a good addition to the Hard Case Crime list.
Well, I couldn’t disagree with that. I’ve been a huge Cain fan since age 18, when on my way home from my first day at Columbia I found a dog-eared copy of Double Indemnity on a used-book table and read it from cover to cover before my bus ride ended. (It’s a short book. And a long bus ride.) I’d tracked down and read every single book Cain ever wrote, even the obscure ones, even the bad ones. Even the short stories. I’d done the same thing with Chandler, with Graham Greene, with Vonnegut. It’s what I did with authors who really struck a chord for me. And Cain struck one that had resonated for fifteen years.
So I began the process of trying to find The Cocktail Waitress. Talked to the literary agents who handled the estate – they’d heard of the book but didn’t have a copy, didn’t know where a copy might be found, discouraged my looking because, well, if it had remained unpublished all this time, how good could it be? I thanked them and went on with my search. Rare book dealers? Collectors of manuscripts? Fellow Cain devotees? I won’t say I talked to everyone, but I talked to a good cross-section, and no one had ever read The Cocktail Waitress. You could get a copy of Willeford’s forbidden Grimhaven (and I did); you could get a two-volume samizdat edition of Salinger’s uncollected short stories (and I did); but not The Cocktail Waitress. There were 34 boxes of writings archived at the Library of Congress, and if I were a Dan Brown character I would have gone down to D.C. and started hunting through them (and wound up chased at gunpoint through the sewers by a maniacal albino, but I digress), but I didn’t – if I had, I would have found it sooner, I now realize, but at the time I assumed what they had was all correspondence, tax returns, and legal papers (most of it is). I did travel a bit, to book shows and conferences, and got the word out about what I was looking for, and none of it did a bit of good. Until one day I was out in Hollywood – Hollywoodland, I suppose I should call it, in deference to the opening of Double Indemnity – and talking with my film and TV agent about the quest, and he said, “You know, I inherited the papers of an old Hollywood agent who used to represent all the big authors when they came out here – Faulkner and Fitzgerald and Chandler and Cain…” And Cain, too? Yes, Cain. Could he take a look through the old man’s files (I’m not being disrespectful, the man had been 91 when he died) and see if maybe, just maybe, there was some germ of a hint of a clue I might follow up on, some thread I could start tugging to see what unraveled? A few days later, I got a package in the mail, containing the manuscript of The Cocktail Waitress. It really was one of those Spielberg moments, as I told Dave Itzkoff in the Times: You open the box and your eyes go wide as your face is bathed in a golden light from below. The thing itself. It was in my hands at last.
SDB: Forgive the hardcore noir nerd question I'm about to ask, but... it sounds like you're working from Cain's original typescript. What does a typed James M. Cain page look like? Pristine? Lots of crossouts? Do the letters practically bleed onto the page? Did you run your fingertips all over the pages in a slightly-orgasmic frenzy? (I would have.)
CA: It wasn’t word-processed, that’s for damn sure. Hammered out on a manual typewriter, good old metal-struck letters in nice even rows. Most pages clean, but where he had an idea for something to insert, it’s scrawled by hand in the left or bottom margin with an arrow showing where he meant the new sentences to go. Cross-outs when he no longer liked a phrase and wanted it changed. He caught word repetitions and fixed them. On the other hand, there were two places where a bit of math is required and he got it wrong both times – computing how much tip is left after you pay for a drink with a twenty dollar bill, and (more forgivably) computing compounded interest on an old debt. Cain’s handwriting is not easy to read, but you have to remember that the man was in his 80s and had had some health problems by then. But when you decipher it, it’s good writing. His editorial instincts were spot on – I don’t think there was one case where he made a change and I thought, That’s a mistake, I preferred it the way he had it originally. One spot of whimsy: When he got to the last page of the novel, he had a lot of blank space left after typing the last line, and he filled it up by typing “T H E E N D” vertically on a slant. You can almost feel the man’s relief and joy at having made it to the end. He knew he was getting on in years and according to his biographer would talk about his own death a lot; he wasn’t sure he still had it in him to write a novel. But man, did he ever.
SDB: Cain seems to be having, as they say, a "moment" (what, with the Mildred Pierce mini-series and snazzy retro Vintage reprints). What is it about his work that keeps it relevant and fresh all of these decades later?
CA: Cain’s work draws you in irresistibly, and I’ve tried over the years to figure out how he does it, but it’s hard to say. Something about the way he inhabits his characters’ voices, something about the intimate first-person narration, something about the sense of desperation – you can feel his characters sweating and breathing hard. There’s usually an element of sex, of course, and one of economic hunger, and since when have lust and greed ever been boring? There’s just something elemental about Cain, like you’re reading about men and women stripped bare, the human animal at its most raw. The emotions aren’t subtle. His people are cruel, they’re passionate, and when they sin, they go all the way.
SDB: Are there other "holy grails" out there? Or is The Cocktail Waitress the big one?
CA: This is the big one for me – there’s nothing else I’ve been looking for this long. You hear rumors about a last, lost “black” Travis McGee, but I’m 99% sure that just doesn’t exist. There’s the original pulp version of THE MALTESE FALCON, but you can find that easily enough if you pay a pulp dealer for it, and I don’t think the differences between the original and the final book version are huge. There are great obscure books I’d love to reprint and the authors have so far said no, but that’s not the same thing – the books exist, anyone can find a copy if they really want. This is the last great undiscovered manuscript that I know of.
Photo: "Cocktail Lounge in New Union Hall," J.R. Eyerman, 1942. Courtesy Google/LIFE.
Senin, 10 Januari 2011
My Love Affair with Mildred
First James M. Cain novel, that is. For me it was Mildred Pierce, which I first read back in February 1995 and promptly sent me off on a sloppy Cain binge (Postman, Indemnity, Serenade, The Butterfly). This was the time in my life when I was young and broke and trying to read every great hardboiled and noir novel I could afford. My supplier was Art Bourgeau, author and co-owner of Philly's legendary Whodunit bookstore. It must have been Art who turned me on to Mildred; I really can't imagine myself being lured in by that kinda dowdy-sounding title alone.
But that's the twisted beauty of a noir like Mildred Pierce. There are no crime lords, no fedoras, no snappy banter, no unsolved murders or any of the other things that readers associate with the genre. Instead Cain gives us a suburban California housewife hell-bent on providing a better life for her daughters, Veda and Ray. And like in every great noir, no good deed goes unpunished. The very sacrifices that give Veda a better life also mortify her; mother and daughter are locked in a classic inescapable Cain "love rack," and it's absolutely devastating.
Again: not the kind of thing you usually associate with noir.
This March HBO will be debuting its five-part mini-series adaptation of Mildred Pierce, directed by Todd Haynes. I can't wait. For some reason, I've never watched the 1946 Joan Crawford version; I think I've always worried that it would pale in comparison to the memory of the novel. (That, and I believe they threw in a murder, just to make it a more of a crime flick.) But enough time has passed, and I have a ton of admiration for the creators and actors involved -- including Kate Winslet, Guy Pearce and Hope Davis. Plus, HBO has proven it can do period pieces (Boardwalk Empire) like nobody's business. The trailer is so lush, I want to nuzzle the damned thing.
But you? You have a little more than two months. Pick up Mildred between now and then and give it a whirl. You might just fall in love, too.
Jumat, 28 November 2008
Koontz on Cain
One of the first books I read about writing was Dean Koontz's How to Write Best Selling Fiction (Writer's Digest Books, 1982). It must have been 1984 or 1985, when I was maybe 12 or 13, and I borrowed it from the Frankford Branch of the Free Library of Philadelphia. I picked up a copy a while back and last night, in a post-turkey haze, thumbed through it again. I was really happy to find this bit about James M. Cain:The Postman Always Rings Twice is as readable and poignant and relevant as it was when it first saw print. Indeed, Postman reads as if it were written last week! Cain was so in touch with the people about whom he wrote, so intimately familiar with the fears and desires of the masses in the 1920s and 1930s, that he seems to have known not only how the common man and woman talked and thought at the time, but also how they would talk and think for decades to come. I am not aware of another American writer of our century whose books have been so utterly untouched by the passage of so many years, as have Cain's.
What was true in 1982 is still true today; Cain's novels (especially his earliest) are as crisp and raw as they were during the last time America tumbled a severe economic downturn (a.k.a., The Great Depression).
And Koontz's guide is still full of excellent advice. Copies are hard to track down these, but if you can find one, I heartily recommend it. The last chapter, "Read Read Read," was a real eye-opener, because it was as if Koontz was subconsciously planting a reading list (Bester, Chandler, Ellison, Hammett, Leonard, Levin, MacDonald, McBain, Stark) in my brain that I'd follow for the next, oh, 25 years.
Sabtu, 19 Juli 2008
James M. Cain Wrote Here
[The ghost seems to] see everything you do, hear everything you say, and disapprove all the way down the line as a matter of principle."
Still:
"[California] hasn't got the climate for ghosts. In this fragrant night, with the bright stars shining overhead, the lights of Hollywood blazing far below... our ghost is a flop."
Senin, 07 Juli 2008
The Mark of Cain
I've been dipping back into one of my favorite author bios these past few days: Roy Hoopes's Cain: The Biography of James M. Cain. It's a big, meaty hardcover that is so detailed, you swear you can hear Cain talking to you, makes jokes, telling you about his life. It's fun to just roll around in for 5o pages at a time. I love author bios, in general. They make me feel just that little bit more sane...Some of my other favorties, off the top of my head, in no particular order:
Savage Art: A Biography of Jim Thompson by Robert Polito
Willeford by Don Herron
Cornell Woolrich: First You Dream, Then You Die by Francis M. Nevins
Divine Invasions: A Life of Philip K. Dick by Lawrence Sutin
The Life of Ian Fleming by John Pearson
The Long Embrace: Raymond Chandler and the Woman He Loved by Judith Freeman
The Life of Raymond Chandler by Frank McShane
Ross Macdonald by Tom Nolan
Martians and Misplaced Clues: The Life and Work of Fredric Brown by Jack Seabrook
Dashiell Hammett: A Life by Diane Johnson
Shadow Man: The Life of Dashiell Hammett by Richard Layman
Dean Koontz: A Writer's Biography by Katherine Ramsland
Stephen King: The Art of Darkness by Douglas E. Winter
Clive Barker: The Dark Fantastic by Douglas E. Winter
Full of Life: A Biography of John Fante by Stephen Cooper
Will Eisner: A Spirited Life by Bob Andelman
Charles Bukowski: Locked in the Arms of a Crazy Life by Howard Sounes
I'm still waiting for an English translation of Phillipe Garnier's Goodis, la Vie en Noir et Blanc. (Or, I'll have to get around to learning French one of these days.) I'd also kill for a good Mickey Spillane bio. Or a Horace McCoy, Charles Williams, Paul Cain, Donald Westlake...
Are there any author bios you'd recommend?
Langganan:
Komentar (Atom)
